Comments on: Accelerators Revisited http://blog.digitalstruct.com/2007/12/24/accelerators-revisited/ Getting inside the mind of a php developer. Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:25:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: _ck_ http://blog.digitalstruct.com/2007/12/24/accelerators-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-39346 _ck_ Mon, 12 May 2008 16:06:58 +0000 http://blog.digitalstruct.com/2007/12/24/accelerators-revisited/#comment-39346 eAccelerator is a dead project? Hmm, is that opinion or fact? The other benchmarks/reviews I have seen show that while it a tad slower than APC in some cases, it's actually more stable and more compatible. eAccelerator is a dead project? Hmm, is that opinion or fact? The other benchmarks/reviews I have seen show that while it a tad slower than APC in some cases, it’s actually more stable and more compatible.

]]> By: Daniel Sydnes http://blog.digitalstruct.com/2007/12/24/accelerators-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-39338 Daniel Sydnes Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:45:40 +0000 http://blog.digitalstruct.com/2007/12/24/accelerators-revisited/#comment-39338 Thanks for publishing these benchmarks, Mike. I wonder if you can provide additional context? For example: - Test results from a control configuration (no accelerator)? Readers would have a better sense of the significance of the performance deltas between the accelerators, as well as what they are missing without opcode acceleration. - Environmental measurements (server load, memory usage, io queue length, etc.)? Readers could discover potential bottlenecks limiting performance in your tests. Thanks again! Thanks for publishing these benchmarks, Mike. I wonder if you can provide additional context? For example:

- Test results from a control configuration (no accelerator)? Readers would have a better sense of the significance of the performance deltas between the accelerators, as well as what they are missing without opcode acceleration.

- Environmental measurements (server load, memory usage, io queue length, etc.)? Readers could discover potential bottlenecks limiting performance in your tests.

Thanks again!

]]> By: vaggos http://blog.digitalstruct.com/2007/12/24/accelerators-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-37317 vaggos Thu, 03 Jan 2008 22:50:54 +0000 http://blog.digitalstruct.com/2007/12/24/accelerators-revisited/#comment-37317 Xcache seems faster for me. Number one compared to the rest. Xcache seems faster for me. Number one compared to the rest.

]]>